Landmark $250m Claim S218173 Vancouver Supreme Court For Unfair Warranty Terms, Owner’s Manual Policies & Fraud. Could it finally be the end of General Motors?

Grossly Unfair GM Warranty

& Owner’s Manual Policies

This page details the grossly unfair and

alleged criminal Warranty and Owner’s

Manual Policies that General Motors are using

to destroy you and your investment in your

GM vehicle. What you’re going to face in their

legal defence and how to defeat them.

I allege the truth is General Motors are bankrupt and they’re only staying in business by criminally dismissing Warranties and cheating customers by using these policies that are really a pile of crap and that are completely unenforceable. This is because their terms and directions, instructions and clauses ‘the act or inaction’ of the customer and vehicle is impossible to verify. This is because either the policies are so idiotic and out of touch with reality and modern day life, or that GM simply don’t have the systems in place or even the innovation within their vehicles to be able to verify whether you broke the terms of the Warranty or not. Their legal tactic is to bully and intimidate.

Through this litigation I have found out that GM seem to be

using a standard Defence which then I would guess is

tailored to the details of each case. However, here are the

basic clauses that are being used and why they are

unenforceable. The wording is found in Warranty terms or

wording and relates to Owner’s Manual wording and

instructions and directions. To put it simply, GM say that

you didn’t follow the directions in the Owner’s Manual and

so your Warranty is invalid.

1). ‘It’s a good idea to perform an oil level check at each

fuel fill’.

You have more chance of winning the lottery than finding anyone who has actually done that. Besides, forecourts wouldn’t even allow it to happen - it’s idiotic and unenforceable.

2). ‘Using the vehicle in an unreasonable manner or in a

manner for which it was not intended’.

What does that mean? Sounds like a nonsense omnibus claim. No proper scope or definition for customers to be able to understand boundaries of what they can use their vehicle for and what they can’t to remain within the confines of the Warranty. See my full explanation at the bottom of this page in my document of proposed changes to the GM Policies.

3). ‘Overloading your vehicle’.

Overloaded meaning over-weighted, or simply full?

4). ‘Failing to maintain your vehicle or not following service

instructions or reccommendations’.

You mean you provide estimates for work that doesn’t need doing and that if customers don’t pay for work that doesn’t need doing, you’re saying their Warranties are invalid? That’s criminal fraud isn’t it? These are all the things that are going to come at you. Don’t be intimidated - it’s a pile of crap being used to perpetrate the biggest criminal fraud in automotive history. The first thing you’re going to want to do is understand this basic argument I put forward, which is what I did to a great effect. During a hearing in Vancouver Supreme Court on 22nd January 2024, I put the following argument to the Judge and he eventually conceded and made the comment that (in relation to the clause ‘perform an oil level check at each fuel fill’) ‘it’s unenforceable’. The argument is this:

Broadly speaking, all General Motors customers are bound

by the same Warranty terms and Owner’s Manual

directions and instructions. There may be some very slight

variation from vehicle to vehicle. Therefore, out of the

portion of the Warranties that General Motors does actually

uphold and pay out on, how does Defendant General

Motors possibly verify whether those customers ‘performed

an oil level check at each fuel fill’ or not??

The Judge said something like ‘well that’s a suggestion of what you can do’ and I replied ‘yes but these people are saying that is what you have to do or otherwise your Warranty is invalid’. He conceded ‘it’s unenforceable’ and he’s right and I am right. Because these policies are such a pile of nonsense they are completely pointless. This argument can be applied to all of the clauses because there isn’t any way that GM can verify any of it. What I believe has been happening is that GM are bullying and intimidating customers and discriminating against poor people or those customers that they judge will not be able to take them to Court because of not having the resources. In the alternative, and after the period of intense bullying and Misconduct in Civil Proceedings, they’ll offer you some crappy lowball amount of compensation and you’ll likely take it, because of the misery and destruction these little shits will wreck upon your life. In this situation and my case, they just wildly, wildly underestimated me and my ability to sue the ass off of these people and potentially bankrupt them. Now they’re screwed either way - they either pay me $250m and change the Warranty policies to properly protect consumers and trade in a proper ethical way, OR, i’ll win in court and take whatever damages the Judge awards. It will set a landmark precedent for everyone to sue that firm and take them down because they won’t be able to afford to pay everyone. Damages of $250m or better won by ‘a poor loser contractor in dirty work clothes’ reflects the damage that Defendant General Motors has caused to Canada and its customers in Canada. Most likely this will ripple effect around the world.

When I win this case, it should open the floodgates for

everyone to sue General Motors for Breach of Warranty

due to grossly unfair and unenforceable Warranty terms

and Owner’s Manual instructions. In theory, everyone

would get the same payout as me depending on their

circumstances. If you have had your Warranty dismissed

and you think you’ve been shafted by General Motors, then

you will have a route of recourse.

I’ll be publishing everything on this website, and I’m going

to write a book on how to defeat General Motors with an

easy winning strategy. I’ve even registered an ISBN

already!

Every lawyer in the world can use my strategy. I’m not a

lawyer or even legally trained. It has been a walk in the

park beating these idiots and the pathetic defence of two of

Canada’s biggest lawfirms. The Defence and conduct of

BLG LLP for GM is horrendous. They’re out of ideas, don’t

have any plausible defence and refuse to settle to try and

save face. Their latest plan is ‘I know - lets file another 700

pages of quadruplicated information which we’ve already

submitted - that might do it’. I reckon Borden Ladner

Gervais LLp is a ‘bums on seats’ (English expression) law

firm of mediocrity. It’s not a fearsome lawfim of legal elites

that you wouldn’t want to face in the Courtroom that’s for

sure, and i’m beating the crap out of them. An untrained

individual without any money or legal help with a just a

$200 printer and a will to succeed for the justice for

everyone. Defendant General Motors would have been

better off just hiring some law students instead - I expect

they would have done better LOL. They’ve used the big

boys but the big boys don’t know how to fight. They’ve

resorted to destroying and forging evidence and bribing

Government Departments.

Buttons: Standard GM Defence you’ll likely see and, my proposed changes to the GM policies. There’s also a pdf word doc that i’m going to write to show how each part of the defence is nonsense and easily proven to be invalid and dismissed.